(4) Creditors if their interests are to be affected by the agreement. (G) Any party to a private transaction agreement entered into pursuant to this section may ask the court to approve the agreement in order to decide whether the representation is made in accordance with Chapter 5803. the revised code was appropriate and to determine whether the agreement contains conditions that the court could have properly approved. While the standardized trust code recognizes that a court may interfere in the management of a trust to the extent that its jurisdiction is invoked by interested parties or is provided for by other legal provisions (see Section 201 A), dispute resolution is encouraged on a non-judicial basis. This section facilitates the drafting of such agreements by giving them the same effect as if they had been approved by the Tribunal. However, in order to obtain such a guarantee, subsection c requires that the out-of-court settlement contain conditions that could be properly authorized by a court. Under this section, an out-of-court settlement cannot be used to obtain an unauthorized result by law that puts an undue end to a position of trust. (F) Notwithstanding all the provisions of this section, in section (D) of Section 5803.03 of the revised code or in any other legal standard to the contrary, an agent acting under the trust instrument represents only his or her own individual or entrepreneurial interests when negotiating or entering into an agreement submitted to this section. No agent acting under the fiduciary instrument is considered to be the representative of an occupier, beneficiary or the interests of a taker or beneficiary when negotiating or concluding an agreement submitted to this section. In the context of an existing trust, the purpose of a private transaction contract is to offer an extrajudicial but legally binding alternative to the estate court when it asks for a change of confidence. As stated in 2005 in the amended and revised Uniformity Code (UTC), “an out-of-court transaction agreement is only valid to the extent that it is not contrary to the core purpose of the trust and contains conditions that could be properly approved by the court under this [code] or other applicable laws.” Some states have adopted Section 111 of the UTC – Written Out-of-Court Settlement Agreements, and others, such as Ohio, have incorporated their own versions of this provision into their state codes.